Site icon CCIS – California Consortium for Independent Study

Changes in Law 2021 – Student Services

Students

Student mental health prioritized

This year, the youth mental health crisis received much-needed attention. Policymakers prioritized the issue responding to the pandemic’s exacerbation of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation rates amongst youth. A leading proponent on this issue was Senator Anthony Portantino (D-La Cañada Flintridge), whose own family has been affected by suicide. The Senator authored companion bills related to youth mental health, both of which were signed by the Governor. SB 14, an urgency measure that took effect upon the Governor’s signature on October 8, adds “for the benefit of the pupil’s mental or behavioral health” to the list of categories of excused absences for purposes of school attendance. SB 14 also requires the California Department of Education (CDE), by January 1, 2023, to recommend best practices and identify evidence-based training programs for schools to address youth behavioral health. The language that would have required LEAs to train their staff utilizing these programs was removed from the bill late in the legislative process due to associated costs.

Governor Newsom also signed Senator Portantino’s SB 224, which requires districts, county offices of education (COEs), and charter schools that provide health instruction to students in middle or high school to include instruction in mental health. The bill outlines the various requirements of this instruction and states that materials used must be appropriate for all races, genders, sexual orientations, ethnic and cultural backgrounds, pupils with disabilities, and English learners. SB 224 also requires that, by January 1, 2024, the CDE develop a plan for expanding mental health instruction in California public schools.

Free menstrual products to be required at more public schools

AB 367, a measure that received national attention and was authored by Assembly Member Cristina Garcia (D-Downey), will require all public schools maintaining any combination of grades 6 to 12 to maintain an adequate supply of free menstrual products in all their women’s and all-gender restrooms, and at least one men’s restroom. Named “The Menstrual Equity for All Act of 2021,” AB 367 also requires schools to post a notice regarding the bill’s requirements in every restroom required to stock products. The provisions of AB 367 must be complied with on or before the start of the 2022-23 school year. AB 367 builds upon earlier legislation authored by Assembly Member Garcia that applied to Title I eligible schools serving the same grades. These measures are part of a broader effort by the Assembly Member to improve access to safe menstrual products. Since 2016, Assembly Member Garcia has introduced multiple legislative measures attempting to exempt menstrual products from sales taxes. These measures have stalled due to their impact on state revenues.

Budget lays groundwork for shift to universal school meals as early as 2022-23

Building on legislation over the past few years aimed at removing the stigma around school meals and increasing student access to nutritious meals, AB 130, the K-12 Education  Omnibus  Trailer Bill, included language providing that, beginning with the 2022-23 school year, all schools will be required to provide two free nutritiously adequate meals to every student who requests one, regardless of whether they are eligible for a free-and-reduced price meal. However, the bill also made this requirement contingent on funding being appropriated in the budget for this purpose, meaning that no school will be required to comply with this requirement until the state provides funding to address the increased cost. Once funded, the state will reimburse a local educational agency (LEA) for “all non-reimbursed expenses accrued in providing United States Department of Agriculture reimbursable meals to students.” In order to be eligible for this additional reimbursement, an LEA must participate in the National School Lunch Program and the National School Breakfast Program, but the requirement to provide two free meals still applies to schools that do not participate in either federal meal program. According to the Legislature, this shift to universal meals is estimated to cost the state $650 million annually.

In an effort to ensure schools are drawing down as much federal school meal funding as possible, and therefore reducing the cost to the state of implementing universal meals, AB 130 also requires any school district or county superintendent of schools that has a high-poverty school in its jurisdiction to apply to operate a universal meal service provision, like Community Eligibility Provision or Provision 2, on or before June 30, 2022. Unlike the requirement to provide two free meals, superintendents must comply with this requirement even if funding is not provided for universal meals in next year’s budget.

The push to transition to universal school meals on the state level was led by the Chair of the Senate Budget Committee, Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), who also ran stand-alone legislation on this issue this year. SB 364, among other things, would have also required the state to shift to universal meals in the 2022-23 school year but Senator Skinner decided to hold the bill after it was clear the universal meals language would be included in the budget.


The Governor signed the following student services bills

Child Nutrition

Homeless/Foster Youth

Mental Health

Pupil Health

Student Services

Exit mobile version