Site icon CCIS – California Consortium for Independent Study

Legislative Update – Charter Schools, Net Neutrality, Cannabis, Special Ed and STEM

Legislation, Office Binder on Wooden Desk. On the table colored pencils, pen, notebook paper

Highlights from Recent Committee Actions

Following the June 1 deadline for bills to pass out of their house of origin and to the second house for consideration, the Senate and Assembly policy committees continued to hear opposite house bills ahead of the policy committee deadline for fiscal bills at the end of the month.

Charter School Bills Advance

Unlike previous weeks’ hearings, where the bills heard were largely non-controversial, last week’s Senate Education Committee hearing saw a number of high-profile education bills. Two of these bills were charter school oversight proposals carried over from last year. AB 276, by Assembly Member Jose Medina, would subject charter schools to the requirements of Brown Act, the Public Records Act, and the Political Reform Act. Committee amendments regarding board member leases and loans moved the California Charter Schools Association to neutral but raised concerns with other opposition, who argued the amendments were unreasonable and too restrictive. The committee also heard AB 406, by Assembly Member Kevin McCarty, which would prohibit a charter school from operating as or being operated by a for-profit entity. While acknowledging that they are still works in progress, the committee passed out both bills, with commitments from each of their authors to continue to work with stakeholders on the final solutions.

Assessments and Pupil Health

Other high profile education bills recently heard and passed out of the education committees include AB 1951 by Assembly Member Patrick O’Donnell, which would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to approve a nationally recognized high school assessment as an optional alternative to the grade 11 Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment. The bill passed out with no no-votes, though Senator Connie Leyva abstained from voting due to concerns raised regarding accommodations for special needs students. In the other house, the Assembly Education Committee heard and passed out SB 1127 by Senator Jerry Hill, which would authorize school governing boards to adopt a policy allowing a parent to administer to his or her student medical cannabis at a school site. Assembly Member Tony Thurmond raised concerns regarding the training of board members if the bill were to become law but the measure eventually passed out on a party line vote of 4-1, with Assembly Members Ash Kalra and Marc Steinorth not voting.

STEM and Special Education

Additionally, with the budget bill now at Governor Brown’s desk for his signature, the committees also heard a number of bill proposals that were initially pushed for inclusion in the final budget package but were ultimately not successful. These measures include AB 2186, Assembly Member Tony Thurmond’s STEM Teacher Grant Program, and AB 2704 and AB 3136, both by Assembly Member O’Donnell, dealing with special education resource centers and special education equalization, respectfully. Both AB 2704 and AB 3136 were included as part of the Assembly’s budget package but were not included as part of the budget deal reached between the Governor and Legislative leadership. Despite this lack of funding, all three bills passed out of the Senate Education Committee unanimously.

Net Neutrality

Additionally, while not heard in an Education policy committee, SB 822 (Wiener), the bill attempting to restore net neutrality in California, passed out of the Communications and Conveyance Committee last week with substantive, hostile amendments that severely diminish the bill’s protections. Senator Scott Wiener, the author of the bill, opened his comments to the committee by asserting that he did not accept the committee’s proposed amendments.  However, in a unique and controversial move, the committee made a motion to vote on inserting the amendments into the bill before hearing any presentation on the measure whatsoever. The motion carried on an 8-0 vote, essentially forcibly amending the bill.  Senator Wiener said what the committee did was “Outrageous… and if not a violation of the Assembly’s rules, was fundamentally unfair.”

Today, the bill will be heard in the Privacy and Consumer Protections Committee.  It seems likely the bill will pass through the committee. What remains to be seen is what form the bill takes as it continues forward.  Senator Wiener has said he plans to continue working on a possible deal to restore the bill to its previous form, or a more palatable form to the proponents of the original bill.  We will continue to monitor this issue closely.

Below is a list of all the actions taken on K-12 bills by each house’s education committees.


Assessment and Accountability

Charter Schools

Curriculum and Instruction

Early Childhood

Facilities

Governance / Operations

Human Resources

School Finance

School Safety

Student Services

Exit mobile version